| 
The research into
Concept Cartoons™ has covered a number of separate themes. These are:
Evaluating
the Concept Cartoon strategy
Exploring
their impact on teaching and learning approaches in science
Exploring
the value of Concept Cartoons for formative assessment
Evaluating
their use on transport systems
Identifying
their role in promoting argument and discussion

Evaluating the Concept CartoonTM strategy
The main features
of the research include:
- How teachers
use them, who they are used with, what are their potential benefits
and drawbacks and how they are managed in the classroom
- Several hundred
teachers, University tutors and student teachers have been involved
in the ongoing evaluation since 1991
- Research shows
that they are a valuable stimulus for investigation, good for informal
assessment, motivating and easy to use in the classroom
- It has resulted
in the creation of the ConCISE Project as a means of sharing Concept Cartoons with teachers
See Keogh, B and
Naylor S (1999), Concept Cartoons, teaching and learning in science:
an evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21,4,431-446

Exploring their impact on teaching and learning approaches
in science
The main features
of the research include:
- How this emerged
as an important issue in evaluating the Concept Cartoon strategy
- How the Concept Cartoons might help introduce constructivist teaching and learning
approaches in the classroom
- Research shows
that linking finding out with developing ideas helps to make a constructivist
approach more manageable
- Has resulted
in changes in the approach to teaching and learning in many schools
and Universities
See Naylor, S. and
Keogh, B. (1999), Constructivism in the Classroom: Theory into Practice.
Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(2) 93-106

Exploring the value of Concept Cartoons™ for formative assessment
The main features
of the research include:
- Research in classrooms
and with student teachers
- The focus has
been on the use of Concept Cartoons as part of an auditing strategy
for subject knowledge in science
- Max de Boo (University
of Hertfordshire) and Rosemary Feasey (University of Durham) were
also involved in this research
- Research shows
that Concept Cartoons generate positive responses to the auditing
process and begin the process of developing ideas further
- One outcome is
the inclusion of Concept Cartoons as a formative assessment strategy
in the pilot materials for the Key Stage 3 Strategy for Science
See Naylor, S.,
Keogh, B., de Boo, M. and Feasey, R. (2001) Formative assessment
using Concept Cartoons: Initial Teacher Training in the UK. In R.
Duit (Ed.) Research in Science Education: Past, Present and Future,
pp.137-142. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Click
here to download this research paper in MS Word format.

Evaluating their use on transport systems
click
here for
more information
The main features
of the research include:
- A focus on the
Science on the Underground project on the London Underground system
- Independent evaluation
by Education Extra when the project was launched in 1998
- Research shows
that the strategy can generate interest in science and may lead to
follow up action
- Resulted in similar
projects taking place in Stockholm (Sweden) and Nizhny Novgorod (Russia)
See Naylor, S. and
Keogh, B. (1999), Science on the Underground: an initial evaluation.
Public Understanding of Science, 8, 1-18

Identifying their role in promoting argument and discussion
The main features
of the research include:
- Argument and
discussion as the main focus of current research
- Research questions
include "What kind of impact do the Concept Cartoons have on
learners' willingness to engage in argument and debate? How does the
use of Concept Cartoons help us to rethink current models for analysing
argument?"
- Bea Downing is
researching this area. She can be contacted at b.downing@mmu.ac.uk
See Naylor S., Downing,
B. and Keogh B. (2001) An empirical study of argumentation in primary
science, using Concept Cartoons as the stimulus. Third International
Conference of the European Science Education Research Association. Thessaloniki,
Greece
See also Naylor S., Keogh B. and Downing, B. (2007) Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37, 17-39.
Click
here to download the ESERA paper in MS Word format.
Click
here to download the RiSE paper in MS Word format.
|